myVamsam Wiki

Shravana Kumar

Shravana · Shravan

The young ascetic accidentally killed by Dasharatha, whose parents cursed the king.

Accounts of this vary across texts and traditions. This entry primarily follows Valmiki Ramayana, with other tellings (Ramcharitmanas (Tulsidas), Regional and folk traditions) noted where relevant.

Relationships

Introduction

Shravana Kumar is the young ascetic whom Dasharatha accidentally killed while hunting. In Valmiki's Ayodhya Kanda, the boy is not given a name. He is described as a hermit's son who was fetching water for his blind parents. The name Shravana Kumar comes from later and popular accounts.

This article primarily follows the Valmiki Ramayana. Where a well-known detail comes from a later retelling or tradition, the article identifies it.

Family

  • Father: Shravana's father
  • Mother: Shravana's mother

The accident

When Dasharatha was a young prince, he went hunting at night. He heard a sound at the river and, thinking it was an elephant drinking, shot an arrow. He had killed a boy who was filling a water pot for his blind parents.

The curse

Dasharatha took water to the parents and confessed. The father cursed him: the king too would die grieving for a son. The parents died on the funeral pyre of their son.

The curse fulfilled

The curse was fulfilled many years later. When Rama was sent into exile, Dasharatha remembered it and died of sorrow, six nights after Rama left.

In popular accounts the boy is known as Shravana Kumar and is known as the ideal son, who carried his blind parents on pilgrimage in baskets hanging from a pole across his shoulder. This pilgrimage story is not in Valmiki.

Sources

  1. Valmiki Ramayana, Ayodhyakanda (primary text) — https://www.valmikiramayan.net/
  2. The Ramayana of Valmiki: An Epic of Ancient India (scholarly) — https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691206868/the-ramayana-of-valmiki

This entry is independently written for myVamsam using the sources listed above. Where traditions differ, this entry identifies the relevant tradition rather than presenting one account as universally established fact.